You wouldn't do it? No. Brett Jackson has the skillset that embodies everything Theo Epstein would (ideally) try and build our farm system around, and he's pretty much MLB ready. Why trade him in this situation? i'm saying if you HAD to trade him in order to get epstein. if it was the difference between getting theo, you wouldn't do it? No, because there are secondary options who are comparable in philosophy, and we wouldn't have to trade someone who might end up being one of our most valuable assets of the last decade. As far as I'm concerned Castro, Jackson, and Cashner should be 100% off limits. Others should be used with caution, but if anyone besides them went in the deal I'd ultimately be fine with it. Castro can't go for obvious reasons Cashner's upside (and cheap talent) is too great to give up on so early Jackson for reasons stated above Personally, I'm more excited about what Jackson can do than Castro. Seriously... if Starlin Castro had the line in MLB that Jackson put up in AAA last season, we'd nut ourselves. If Castro at his peak = Jackon's AAA numbers we'd be thrilled... and Jackson (nor Castro) are even fully developed. Sure, Jackson might end up as a .265 hitter with 15 homers, 20 stolen bases, and 130K's each year, but he's got the plate discipline to keep his OBP above .350 and he plays above average defense. And when you're getting him for pennies on the dollar playing a generally weak offensive position that's pretty damn valuable