Jump to content
North Side Baseball

WilcoFan

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    583

  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by WilcoFan

  1. WilcoFan
    Seriously. Please stop. Alfonso freakin Soriano has probably never once laid down a sacrifice bunt in his lifetime. I see...condescending sarcasm is only allowed if you subscribe completely and thoroughly to Win Probability Theory. Got it.
  2. WilcoFan
    Good thing we didn't bunt last inning.
  3. WilcoFan
    Would have had a runner on 3rd with Blanco up. That fly ball could have won it. So you'd have had Soriano bunt? Apparently, sarcasm only goes one way.
  4. WilcoFan
    Would have had a runner on 3rd with Blanco up. That fly ball could have won it.
  5. WilcoFan
    Stats are wonderful things. In the wrong hands, they're dangerous.
  6. WilcoFan
    And if he picks it, that's a double play. The only reason he didn't pick it was because of (drumroll please!). The threat of the bunt.
  7. WilcoFan
    Those are very nice numbers. You want a guy in scoring position. You can say what you want, but statistics show that bunting decreases your chances of winning That's very nice. Good for statistics. Bill Plashke, is that you? Nothing like utterly distorting my point. In THIS SITUATION, you bunt. uh no, based on this exact situation, it still lowers your win probability. Actually, no it doesn't, as 1% is not a significant statistical difference. Its a judgment call. and a stupid one to take the bat out of a good hitter so an inferior hitter can bat with a runner on 2nd. That's very nice. I disagree.
  8. WilcoFan
    Those are very nice numbers. You want a guy in scoring position. You can say what you want, but statistics show that bunting decreases your chances of winning That's very nice. Good for statistics. Bill Plashke, is that you? Nothing like utterly distorting my point. In THIS SITUATION, you bunt. uh no, based on this exact situation, it still lowers your win probability. Actually, no it doesn't, as 1% is not a significant statistical difference. Its a judgment call.
  9. WilcoFan
    Those are very nice numbers. You want a guy in scoring position. You can say what you want, but statistics show that bunting decreases your chances of winning That's very nice. Good for statistics. Bill Plashke, is that you? Nothing like utterly distorting my point. In THIS SITUATION, you bunt. They just showed you that in that situation you don't bunt. Because of a statistically insignificant 1% difference. Nothing like being a slave to the numbers.
  10. WilcoFan
    Those are very nice numbers. You want a guy in scoring position. You can say what you want, but statistics show that bunting decreases your chances of winning That's very nice. Good for statistics. Bill Plashke, is that you? Nothing like utterly distorting my point. In THIS SITUATION, you bunt.
  11. WilcoFan
    Those are very nice numbers. You want a guy in scoring position. You can say what you want, but statistics show that bunting decreases your chances of winning That's very nice. Good for statistics.
  12. WilcoFan
    Those are very nice numbers. You want a guy in scoring position. obviously not. you cant disprove numbers like that Ummm...I'm not sure if you know what the word "disprove" means.
  13. WilcoFan
    Those are very nice numbers. You want a guy in scoring position.
  14. WilcoFan
    Because you've hit into four double plays already today. And that impacts this how? You want a guy in scoring position. End of story. youre not going to win this I know...groupthink rules all. Common sense =/= group think. Common sense would have to be common, wouldn't it? You want a guy in scoring position if you only need one. Sorry.
  15. WilcoFan
    Because you've hit into four double plays already today. And that impacts this how? You want a guy in scoring position. End of story. youre not going to win this I know...groupthink rules all.
  16. WilcoFan
    Because you've hit into four double plays already today. And that impacts this how? You want a guy in scoring position. End of story. not at the expense of outs In the ninth. In a tie game. Yes you do.
  17. WilcoFan
    Because you've hit into four double plays already today. And that impacts this how? You want a guy in scoring position. End of story.
  18. WilcoFan
    Because you've hit into four double plays already today.
  19. WilcoFan
    After that first pitch, you knew he wasn't going anywhere near the plate with Ramirez.
  20. WilcoFan
    3.5
  21. WilcoFan
    LaTroy Hawkins says hi. Thanks for the drink through the nose.....So true. Todd Hundley would like to say hello as well. When my friends and I played MLB '02, Todd Hundley took one in the earhole every at bat, regardless of the score or how many were on base.
  22. WilcoFan
    3.5
  23. WilcoFan
    Who cares.
  24. WilcoFan
    Add a "y" to the front of the "our" in this sentence, and its trolling. Feel free to explain that one away, mods.
  25. WilcoFan
    Besides being one of the best backup best shortstops in baseball? Nothing. Slick defense, cool. He sucks at everything else. God, give me strength. He's not short, white and productive, so he's inherently a great player.
×
×
  • Create New...