i really can't comprehend how you think it would be better for BA to get their information from talking to beat writers than to get it from talking to scouts. both sources are secondhand and both sources have seen the players play...but beat writers are going to invariably be very, very, very biased in their opinions. plus, and no offense, i would trust the opinion of a scout over a media guy every day of the week. announcers/writers are students of broadcasting/media, scouts have likely spent their entire lives in baseball. also, go ahead and look at their top 100 list from last year. they have managers' quotes all over the place. they absolutely do talk to managers/coaches, and you're simply wrong in saying that they don't. and they're also flat out right year after year on some guys. and you're flat out wrong on some guys. it's not an exact science, and, despite what you say, i don't believe BA promotes itself as the "gospel," nor do i think anyone else believes it to be.