anabiono

marshall, marmol, or a trade. yes, but what trade? Z for Ervin Santana and prospects? :lol: i would totally be down with that Z needs to see a therapist concerning his emotional rollercoaster tendencies Especially if the prospect is Nick Adenhart. alright guys, lets storm the office...take out hendry and get this team up to par

marshall, marmol, or a trade. yes, but what trade? Z for Ervin Santana and prospects? :lol: i would totally be down with that Z needs to see a therapist concerning his emotional rollercoaster tendencies

marshall, marmol, or a trade. yes, but what trade?

Marmol and Cotts probably unlikely that we get a decent pitcher for jacque eh?

who is a little nervous about angel's start tomorrow if he doesn't pitch well...there are not many options left for the 5th spot

wouldn't you guys rather have cedeno sent down than pie?

Ya I know. They should get sued for false advertising. I'm listening to it on the net now. At least they let you listen to it. can someone enlighten me to the reason this game and every other game to start within the next few hours is showing up as being blacked out? this cubs game isn't on fox...so...i don't understand why i cannot watch it

this is a nice start i have been waiting a while for one of these my hopes have been lifted yay

it is starting to get very frustrating

there's no ugly tonight only domination

it really would be tragic to see him pitching else where in the league

Admittedly, this is only one example, but... 2006 World Series Champion StL Cardinals record in one-run games...22-27. i am still mad because of last year...but i see what you are getting at god i hope they kick the living crap out of those punks this weekend

ok...but putting that in context...seattle didn't make the postseason...therefore, it has no event on my arguement are you serious? yes I'm confused as to why the Seattle record "has no event". The point was that Seattle had a winning record in one run games, and yet that didn't affect their overall record. Indians had a losing record in one run games, and yet they managed to still win 93 games. Those are both significant in that it shows that one run games have little to no effect on overall record. Who made the playoffs has nothing to do with anything. yeah, i meant to say no bearing...i am just waking up...sorry for the shoddy typing... but i am not relating it to the season...i am trying to relate it to the postseason and series I see. I'm not sure why we should be concerned about our one-run record then, because if we don't make the playoffs, it doesn't matter at all then. It's April, and we're 5 games back already. Lets just concentrate on getting back to .500...blowouts or not. let me just say this...i was being melodramatic when i said the 40 game win streak stuff...i will take that in the off chase it happened and be high on life because of it...but...i still think it is foolish to believe that there will be no close games in the playoffs all i am saying is that, so far, it looks like the cubs have a very bad habit of choking or just plain giving in when it is a close game i just really want to see that change is all because, personally, i want this team to be running on all cylinders when going into the playoffs...i want them to chew up teams and spit them out...i want them to lay waste to the NL field, and then i want them to walk into the series and mark their territory in a very unforgettable way... i just want total domination...is that too much to ask? 8-)

Tomorrow's an offday. Which just proves all the more that if they do tank, this win will be meaningless. What if they get tanked? i don't think i can handle getting demolished by the cardinals again

ok...but putting that in context...seattle didn't make the postseason...therefore, it has no event on my arguement are you serious? yes I'm confused as to why the Seattle record "has no event". The point was that Seattle had a winning record in one run games, and yet that didn't affect their overall record. Indians had a losing record in one run games, and yet they managed to still win 93 games. Those are both significant in that it shows that one run games have little to no effect on overall record. Who made the playoffs has nothing to do with anything. yeah, i meant to say no bearing...i am just waking up...sorry for the shoddy typing... but i am not relating it to the season...i am trying to relate it to the postseason and series

hahaha...i can't type today wow...who think's they can pull this out and finish 12-13 this month? i am glad i didn't go to work today since the cubbies aren't playing tomorrow

I think if we can blow teams out for 40 straight games we'd be sittin pretty. Do people not understand that blowing teams out is more impressive than winning close games? I think its a pretty common misconception. Winning close games just means you got a little lucky and was evenly matched with another team. Blowing a team out means you beat them in every sense of the game. Or in this case it means they scored a bunch of runs on the Brewers worst pitchers. In 2005, the Indians had 93 wins but were 22-36 in one run games. That same season, Seattle had 69 wins but was 26-23 in one run games ok...but putting that in context...seattle didn't make the postseason...therefore, it has no event on my arguement are you serious? yes

I think if we can blow teams out for 40 straight games we'd be sittin pretty. Do people not understand that blowing teams out is more impressive than winning close games? I think its a pretty common misconception. Winning close games just means you got a little lucky and was evenly matched with another team. Blowing a team out means you beat them in every sense of the game. Or in this case it means they scored a bunch of runs on the Brewers worst pitchers. In 2005, the Indians had 93 wins but were 22-36 in one run games. That same season, Seattle had 69 wins but was 26-23 in one run games ok...but putting that in context...seattle didn't make the postseason...therefore, it has no event on my arguement

blah blah blah mark it dlee will hit 40 tontos this year

:-({|= Enjoy the win man! dude, i do enjoy the win...i am just looking for more i have been enjoying the wins everyfewtimes this season...but then comes the heartbreak...and the heartbreak is not something championships routinely do in my opinion I know but no need to pick apart the win. Would you rather the Cubs have scored less runs in the game so we could win a close one? i am not picking apart this win...i love that they are winning...my mood is determined by the cubbies...so i have been a little bit of a basketcase this april... but yes, given a choice...i would have rather had them win a close one today...one where they could celebrate in dramatic fashion around homeplate at the end this team needs some of that mojo

I think if we can blow teams out for 40 straight games we'd be sittin pretty. Do people not understand that blowing teams out is more impressive than winning close games? I think its a pretty common misconception. Winning close games just means you got a little lucky and was evenly matched with another team. Blowing a team out means you beat them in every sense of the game. not necessarily...not when you are making a run at a championship...you would be foolish to think that you could accomplish that feat without getting involved in at least a couple of very important close games

:-({|= Enjoy the win man! dude, i do enjoy the win...i am just looking for more i have been enjoying the wins everyfewtimes this season...but then comes the heartbreak...and the heartbreak is not something championships routinely do in my opinion

alright, it is fine and dandy that the boys are winning and what have you, but i seriously am not going to be a believer in this team until they turn around their 0-8 is 2 runs or less games and their 0-3 in extra inning games record... by a turnaround, i mean a winning record in those categories...you may call me a dreamer, but i truly feel that this team could go all the way this year... i think that the series could quite possibly be the sox vs. the cubs...and the cubs can take em...in theory however, i don't care if they go on a friggin 40 game win streak right now blowing the crap out of their opponents...if they don't turnaround those championship team categories...then they just will not have what it takes when it comes down to the nitty gritty my 3 cents

crap...i better not have just sat down to watch another childish meltdown

anyone be so kind to tell me how the runs were scored? i just came home from work and saw the aram homer... thank you