Go ask the Nationals and the Dodgers. this is about the most extreme example you could use to display the importance of managers Not really, let's keep it straight to the performance of the SP: The Dodgers had to trade for Mat Latos(on purpose!) and Alex Wood because they lost McCarthy and Ryu. Part of that is probably bad fortune, part of that is 'Brandon McCarthy is injury-prone', and part of that is not having enough SP depth to avoid their current rotation of Kershaw/Greinke/sorrow/weeping/teeth-gnashing. The Nationals went 6 deep with quality starters, until Roark and Fister both unexpectedly cratered, and they needed some unexpectedly good play from Ross to bridge that gap. Strasburg and Gio both way underperformed their FIP too. The point here isn't 'don't add really good pitchers', but rather that pitching means next to nothing on paper. If they have the money I'd really like to see them spend on their favorite of Price/Zimmermann because of concerns about depth/durability, but if they decide that the best option with the available money is to ramp up the numbers instead, I'm probably not going to have a huge problem with that. Thanks. I certainly wasn't trying to make a point about managers. Just the craziness of the (I know not totally serious) "how could they lose two games in a row" comment. A super strong rotation just isn't a guarantee for success in the regular season, let alone the playoffs. Just look at the rotations of the Royals and Giants last year. While that certainly doesn't mean "don't go out and sign more pitching" it does mean that I'm not going to be broken up if they pursue more mid-tier options rather than a Price type.