I agree, but look how many different sources are now saying that that number was off. How do we know that they aren't all using the same source? Hey, I hope they are wrong. Personally, I don't think there's anyway that that pitch was under 91. I hear ya... I'm just saying, the pattern of the reporting, for some of the articles, is exact; "averaged 86 to 87 m.p.h., topping out at 89." We know none of the writers have radar guns. It's very possible that most of them sought the advice of a particular scout or relied on the in-house reading (which might be inaccurate too). On the road, other teams may slow down the gun.