That's not true at all. A pitcher could theoretically allow 27 hits over 9 innings and pick up a shut out. That would be insanely lucky. Okay, I would still rather him not get into the situations that require him to have to make a big pitch. It's not. Who was suggesting otherwise? I don't know what you're getting at here. Good defense is a part of the game, sure. But if you rely on it all afternoon, it means you might be having a lucky day. Reversing the situation, I'm sure you would think a guy like Looper would be lucky had he have pitched the game he did today. You would liekly be complaining that we left runners on all day, etc. Marquis pitches to contact, and he isn't a big strikeout pitcher, so he will always rely heavily on his defense. There is nothing wrong with a pitcher leaning on his defense in every start. The Cardinals traditionally play outstanding defense that helps their pitchers win. IMO, it isn't luck for the winner as much as it's lack of execution for the loser. The point I was making about the comparison to Zambrano is, no one says Z is lucky when he gets out of similar jams. If a sinker ball pitcher is able to get a ground ball for an inning ending double play, he's no more lucky than someone who can strikeout the side with the bases loaded. The only difference is that the defense plays a larger role in helping the groundball pitcher.