Jump to content
North Side Baseball

RichHillIsABeast

Verified Member
  • Posts

    5,033
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by RichHillIsABeast

  1. .258/.298/.398 His bat sure makes up for it.
  2. do you want to be put in time out again? you just said you are sorry for derailing this thread and then you continue to do it with the very next post. anyways to add to this actual trade. It's an upgrade but bench upgrades are worthless for catchers. they just dont play enough to make a difference. we're talking about less than half a run or so You'd rather have a catcher that costs you the game down the stretch? the chances a catcher loses a game down the stretch are slim to none. See Barrett, Michael. thanks for the (lack of an) argument. how many games does an above average catcher win you? how many games does he cost you with his long tosses into LF in a routine rundown? I'm tempted to add "priceless" but that's so overdone, right, meph?
  3. Don't you have a wife and a kid? http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/neglect If you'd find some personality, you might be able to have one too. You mean the daughter I never see b/c I'm too busy posting 30,000+ times? I see my daughter plenty. Took her to the zoo this afternoon after the Cubs game. We had a great time. Would you like to see pics? Absolutely. I think everyone is looking forward to them. Who doesn't want to see pictures of Broadway, Madison, St. Charles Street or whatever her name is? I'm game. Kids at the zoo push me into that happy place. You know. Umpalumpas, chocolate rivers, and glass elevators.
  4. yeah, but my guess certainly wasn't rhiab insulting vance's parental abilities. Yeah, thankfully that derailed the reds44 hating which based on the last thread and the board this week could have been brutal and long. no hate was intended. He said his "source" called him. I just pointed out there was a better source that had reported the trade as completed four hours ago. No hate; just posting the facts. He was just poking fun. Chill out.
  5. do you want to be put in time out again? you just said you are sorry for derailing this thread and then you continue to do it with the very next post. anyways to add to this actual trade. It's an upgrade but bench upgrades are worthless for catchers. they just dont play enough to make a difference. we're talking about less than half a run or so You'd rather have a catcher that costs you the game down the stretch? the chances a catcher loses a game down the stretch are slim to none. See Barrett, Michael.
  6. do you want to be put in time out again? you just said you are sorry for derailing this thread and then you continue to do it with the very next post. anyways to add to this actual trade. It's an upgrade but bench upgrades are worthless for catchers. they just dont play enough to make a difference. we're talking about less than half a run or so You'd rather have a catcher that costs you the game down the stretch?
  7. Don't you have a wife and a kid? http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/neglect If you'd find some personality, you might be able to have one too. You mean the daughter I never see b/c I'm too busy posting 30,000+ times? I see my daughter plenty. Took her to the zoo this afternoon after the Cubs game. We had a great time. Would you like to see pics? Absolutely.
  8. do you want to be put in time out again?
  9. Don't you have a wife and a kid? http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/neglect If you'd find some personality, you might be able to have one too. You mean the daughter I never see b/c I'm too busy posting 30,000+ times?
  10. Don't you have a wife and a kid? http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/neglect
  11. Oh please. Post about the topic, not the poster.
  12. Does it matter if the production is from power or getting on base? Production is production. If we're not going to play Murton, trade him to a team that would value his services (im looking at you Billy Beane). Trade Murton+ for a guy like Swish. I understand that production is production. I'm not opposed to Murton being recalled; in fact I was opposed to his demotion. That being said, if we could get Sosa for say Ryan Harvey or Brian Dopirak....I really don't think he'd be a bad risk. yeah but he doesnt exactly give us a big payout. id rather go fishing on dope or harvey than know what im not getting with sosa I agree with you there. Isn't it sad when Sosa isn't worth Dope or Harvey? But wait, he mashes against LHP. Get him!!
  13. Yeah, Vazquez played a year, then got traded. Soriano played a year, then refused to re-sign. Neither team sniffed the playoffs. That worked well. Both of those trades happend in the offseason too, not in the middle of a pennant race where somebody could come in and cost a team a playoff run. And seriously, you and Vance need to stop acting like mods. You're not. I doubt Sosa's arrival is going to cost this team anything. However, we're woeful against LHP. Despite all the flaws currently in Sosa's game, hitting against LHP isn't one of them. It's not likely to happen because of Jim. Sosa, however, doesn't have a say...and I believe he wouldn't mind the trade at all, especially as his PT in Texas begins to diminish. No, it's just defense and all around offense that disqualifies Sosa from ever being a consideration for being on a playoff team. I'm digging that .738 OPS. It looks like something we could nab from the AAA scrapheap. Key there was LHP Big whoop. Matt Murton vs. LHP in AAA: .328/.404/.563/.967 (128 AB) Last i checked, that's good. those are the wrong numbers. my bad, .405/.511/.730/1.241 (37 AB) Even better, and before you go sayng it's a small sample size, he's already proved he can hit lefties well at the ML level. Where have I ragged on Murton? I'll admit, he's not my favorite player, but calling him up from AAA to platoon is better than trading for Sosa and his corked bats - I'm assuming the cork is free.
  14. Yeah, Vazquez played a year, then got traded. Soriano played a year, then refused to re-sign. Neither team sniffed the playoffs. That worked well. Both of those trades happend in the offseason too, not in the middle of a pennant race where somebody could come in and cost a team a playoff run. And seriously, you and Vance need to stop acting like mods. You're not. I doubt Sosa's arrival is going to cost this team anything. However, we're woeful against LHP. Despite all the flaws currently in Sosa's game, hitting against LHP isn't one of them. It's not likely to happen because of Jim. Sosa, however, doesn't have a say...and I believe he wouldn't mind the trade at all, especially as his PT in Texas begins to diminish. No, it's just defense and all around offense that disqualifies Sosa from ever being a consideration for being on a playoff team. I'm digging that .738 OPS. It looks like something we could nab from the AAA scrapheap. Key there was LHP Big whoop. Matt Murton vs. LHP in AAA: .328/.404/.563/.967 (128 AB) Last i checked, that's good. those are the wrong numbers. my bad, .405/.511/.730/1.241 (37 AB)
  15. Yeah, Vazquez played a year, then got traded. Soriano played a year, then refused to re-sign. Neither team sniffed the playoffs. That worked well. Both of those trades happend in the offseason too, not in the middle of a pennant race where somebody could come in and cost a team a playoff run. And seriously, you and Vance need to stop acting like mods. You're not. I doubt Sosa's arrival is going to cost this team anything. However, we're woeful against LHP. Despite all the flaws currently in Sosa's game, hitting against LHP isn't one of them. It's not likely to happen because of Jim. Sosa, however, doesn't have a say...and I believe he wouldn't mind the trade at all, especially as his PT in Texas begins to diminish. No, it's just defense and all around offense that disqualifies Sosa from ever being a consideration for being on a playoff team. I'm digging that .738 OPS. It looks like something we could nab from the AAA scrapheap. Key there was LHP Big whoop. Matt Murton vs. LHP in AAA: .328/.404/.563/.967 (128 AB)
  16. Yeah, Vazquez played a year, then got traded. Soriano played a year, then refused to re-sign. Neither team sniffed the playoffs. That worked well. Both of those trades happend in the offseason too, not in the middle of a pennant race where somebody could come in and cost a team a playoff run. And seriously, you and Vance need to stop acting like mods. You're not. I doubt Sosa's arrival is going to cost this team anything. However, we're woeful against LHP. Despite all the flaws currently in Sosa's game, hitting against LHP isn't one of them. It's not likely to happen because of Jim. Sosa, however, doesn't have a say...and I believe he wouldn't mind the trade at all, especially as his PT in Texas begins to diminish. No, it's just defense and all around offense that disqualifies Sosa from ever being a consideration for being on a playoff team. I'm digging that .738 OPS. It looks like something we could nab from the AAA scrapheap.
  17. I'm sure there's a sentence somewhere in there, but I can't find it. There ya go. However, Sosa has no control. No NTC. The Rangers could trade him to the Devil Rays if they wanted to. Have you ever seen somebody traded to a place where he truly did not want to play? Soriano to the Nationals, spring 2006. Soriano didn't want to play left, he didn't mind going to the Nationals. and I'm sure Sosa might not want to platoon, but wouldn't mind going to Chicago (considering his agent called the Cubs first when he was looking to comeback.) Seems quite similar. Thanks for playing. It's obvious that platooning and coming home to start are the same thing. Elementary my dear watson.
  18. Byrnes is a hard worker, both in the box and in the field. Unfortunately hard work doesn't equal production. We have one future spot open in the OF. That is RF. Soriano in LF. Pie in CF. Byrnes in RF is a joke offensively. We'd be better off platooning Jones and someone who could mash LHP (plenty of cheap options available).
  19. Bad stat. Decent outing. I liked watching Rich throw that change today. Im glad he decided to start throwing it. Instead of throwing a curve in a 2-1 count when the batter knows he will throw one, he can now throw his change and get hitters to ground out to the 3B and 1B. Yeah, I prefer his 1.14 WHIP. 8-)
  20. Nice game today. 1 ER in 6 IP is pretty good when you don't have your best stuff and the defense decides to take a nap. That 3.58 ERA sure does suck, one-pitch-Rich.
  21. DeRo = da bestest FA utility player to starter signing ever.
  22. I'll be honest, I really don't know what Demp usually tops out at. Is 92 okay? It's good coming off an oblique injury, but I've seen him hit mid 90's regularly. He'll get there. His offspeed stuff is good enough to deal with a temporary drop in fastball pitch speed.
×
×
  • Create New...