IMO, Hughes comes off as closeminded and uninformed on the "other" side, probably the worst of the 4. Bane and the non-McCracken stat guy come off the best, and McCracken doesn't tolerate the other side much at all. Personally, I don't have a problem with either of them being closeminded in their current positions. Hughes specializes in scouting, McCracken in statistical analysis, if I'm a GM I would want them giving me the input from their standpoint before making a decision. I'd be less confident with Hughes as a GM but I think he's such a good scout that his franchise could be sucessful in the Braves, Marlins, Twins mold.