Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Sammy Sofa

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    98,224
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    208

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Sammy Sofa

  1. Because I'm playing devil's advocate where they start 2011 with Colvin as the starting 1B, and that's no good for anyone. And how does this "add to his versatility" or "increase his trade value?" 1B is where teams dump players who can't cut it defensively anywhere else.
  2. They'd still be negotiating from a "weak position" even if he played every single game at 1B for the rest of the season. Unless he's some kind of Dunn-in-the-making this could be a very, very bad sign.
  3. http://jemima.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/jk_bangheadwall.jpg [expletive], 2011 is going to suuuuuuuuck.
  4. Oh, good. The meatheads have already turned on Cashner. Welp, he's doomed.
  5. He's not horrible in the OF. I've seen him play horribly many many times and make very few catches that were not routine. On a scale from 1-10(10 being the best) he would come in around a 4 IMO and he is only that high b/c he has a great arm. He is better than Dunn out there but is well below average. You're not basing this on anything except what you think you've seen? What I think I've seen???? He does not go come in, go back, or go to his right well. He does cover a decent amount of ground to his left - not as much as he should with his speed though. I'm just letting you clarify what you're measuring his defensive capabilities by.
  6. He's not horrible in the OF. I've seen him play horribly many many times and make very few catches that were not routine. On a scale from 1-10(10 being the best) he would come in around a 4 IMO and he is only that high b/c he has a great arm. He is better than Dunn out there but is well below average. You're not basing this on anything except what you think you've seen?
  7. Did you look at his A ball numbers? They weren't terrible, but they weren't good. In low A. The only thing going for him is that he's 19. It's ok, I'm not saying it was a bad trade or anything like that. He's a very intriguing guy. Stats aren't the best thing to judge kids of that age on. Go look at Chris Archer's stats before we acquired him from Cleveland. We got a kid with solid upside here and the more I read, the better I think we did on this one. Especially with the record of success the Cubs have with pitching prospects.
  8. Did you look at his A ball numbers? They weren't terrible, but they weren't good. In low A. The only thing going for him is that he's 19. Only being 19 is pretty huge.
  9. Yeah, the Padres have had it easy, what with every team in their division except one having a record over .500! HERE COMES LEGIT PITCHING.
  10. OK, yes, it's all smoke and mirrors that they have a .605 record and are 5.5 games up on the Giants and are in first place.
  11. I think you're very confused. The Padres have a team that is playing well and the Cubs have a middle of the pack offense.
  12. Albert Pujols.
  13. So much karma.
  14. Holy tiny sample size, Batman. Just give it up.
  15. Yup. Ah-booooooooooooo, McD's. Go, old lady.
  16. I read it in law school, so I actually do remember some of the facts. And I just looked it up again. I never suggested she wasn't burned badly, but the suit was ridiculous. Lots of companies served coffee at high temperatures and it's sort of ridiculous to think that spilling coffee isn't going to burn you. As I recall, this wasn't her first McD's coffee, so she sort of knew what she was getting but put the really hot coffee between her old and presumably not terribly stable knees anyway. The people at McDs who refused her initial request probably got fired b/c even though I think it was the right legal decision, it was a bad business decision (even if they would have "won" the suit, the cost would be more than $20k and the bad publicity only adds to the cost). I don't know, maybe I'm just naive but it seems like there's a difference between serving coffee that's satisfyingly hot for most customers and so hot that if spilled on someone it requires skin grafts. I just think it's ridiculous that it's become the poster child for frivolous lawsuits where people are suing for millions of dollars when she sued a company for $20k to cover around $11k in medical costs.
  17. As much of a mouthbreather as Kaplan is, he's pretty well connected. This wouldn't be the first deal, or even the third, that he's been the first to report. Damn, really? That's depressing. Not that Lee might be traded, but that Kaplan has any legitimacy.
  18. Is it bad that I want this to be untrue just because this [expletive] [expletive] reported it? Not at all.
  19. The worst thing about this is being subjected to "Kap's Corner" and the ghoulish image that went along with it. Good Lord. Has anyone picked up on this besides Kaplan? If not, that doesn't really give it much legs since, well, it's Kaplan.
  20. Does nobody actually know the details of the McDonald's coffee suit? The woman received 3rd degree burns and initially wanted help paying her medical bills (suing McDonald's for $20k). Everyone talks about it like she was mildly burned and then started screaming for a bajillion dollars.
×
×
  • Create New...