Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Sammy Sofa

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    98,033
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    206

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Sammy Sofa

  1. they have room to play in those countries. finding playable fields to practice on that aren't five miles outside the city is a problem for the kids around here. What the hell can baseball do about that though? What they have been doing; investing in the construction and maintaining of baseball facilities.
  2. I'm aware, but nothing is going to be a cure all. Expecting baseball to do a ton more is pretty noble, but crazy. They're businesses and it makes a lot more sense for them to set up baseball academies in other countries. I'm not sure how anyone can change that? Uh, what? It's MLB that really wants to get these kids into baseball because it's good for their business. They're missing out on a ton of amazing athletes that they want playing baseball. I have no idea why you're acting like this is something that MLB is being forced or pressured to do; they WANT to do it.
  3. The bigger issue for poor kids in American cities is the lack of playing fields as opposed to the lack of equipment (which is still a big issue).
  4. RBI isn't some kind of cure-all.
  5. I agree, but thought black kids found baseball boring and that was more why they were avoiding baseball. It's not that simple. Too many don't even have a chance to give it a shot.
  6. Which is why I posted some actual information on the subject. Some people like to follow along with the rumors and hard information as it is breaking instead of waiting for the final result to show up in the updated title. It's like actually watching the baseball game and riding it's ups and downs instead of reading the box score. So ask the admins to create a news-only thread about the guy. People bull [expletive] about the topic at hand is also part of the process.
  7. Because by and large white athletes have more access to the ways and means to play more sports.
  8. No, because nobody is worried about that. Why? What's the difference? Because other than a few outliers like Steve Nash, watching white people play basketball is boring. Oh so just because you're racist you're ok with it? Ok. Inadvertently the Post of the Day.
  9. Every. Single. Time. Every single time there's some ongoing thread about a potential trade or signing they're ALWAYS updated in the title when something actually happens, yet every single time you also have people complaining that they have to read through multiple pages to find out if something happened. Even Pavlov's dog is ashamed by this.
  10. Yuuuuuuuuuuuuuup. Plus: [expletive] white people. They can still stand to lose a few things.
  11. No, because nobody is worried about that.
  12. Pretending there's a Bulls/Pacers rivalry is pretty much on par with Brewers fans that insist that there's a Brewers/Cubs rivalry.
  13. It's worth it just for this.
  14. That was fantastic.
  15. I point you to the Darvish example and what we offered him... They appear to not be willing to overpay for FA or non-MLB talent (Japan, DR etc...). None of us have any clue what the Cubs bid for Darvish.
  16. Wait, what? So they won't pay for past performance...and they also won't pay for unproven talent?
  17. Can't wait until dumbass Cubs fans are "welcoming" him with stupid Fidel/Che hats and and fake beards and fake cigars.
  18. ... for the reasons I stated. Getting rid of the DH achieves the same objectives. No, you flank steak; I want it for consistency AND because I like it more than the pitcher hitting.
  19. No way, expanding the bench would be totally just as good.
  20. This part isn't really true. The NL has better #7 and #8 hitters than the AL #8 and #9 hitters. Even when you compare it 7 and 8 to 7 and 8 it's close. The worst hitter besides an NL #9 hitter is an AL #9 hitter, and it's not particularly close. The NL does seem to put poor hitters in the #2 spot though. Here's last year OPS advantages: #1 spot- NL by 11 points #2-AL by 62 #3-NL by 12 #4-NL by 33 #5-AL by 22 #6-NL by 3 #7-AL by 9 #8-AL by 5 #9-AL by 164 Total: AL by 20 I was surprised to see from how much we talk about sluggers going to the AL that the NL led in both the 3 and 4 spot last year, and by a decently large margin in the 4 spot. Oh well. I'd still rather have the DH. And does this track back consistently?
  21. This. This is the main argument to me.
  22. That's a bit of a disingenuous comparison, wouldn't you say? Most minor leagues adopted the DH because they're developmental leagues where it's very beneficial to have the additional hitters in the lineup every day rather than a couple pitcher at bats. How is it disingenuous? I want the DH; pretty much everyone except the NL uses it. I really don't care about the details or they reasons why certain leagues have it...I just want consistency and I'm sick of my team playing at a needless disadvantage.
  23. I understand what Rob is saying and used to completely agree with that line of thinking, but you do have to admit it's pretty ludicrous that the NL exists as this bizarre bastion of "strategy" when pretty much every single other level of professional and amateur baseball has evolved past it (or at least wised up and have the option to use it). I guess they can join arms with the Japanese Central League and proudly march off of a cliff together or something. Plus I think it has a ripple effect and makes it more acceptable/tolerable to have too many shitty players out there because they're "just batting down by the pitcher's spot." Too often the 7-8 spots are just black holes of suck because of the damned #9 spot.
×
×
  • Create New...