I think its a hedge type of thing. HS position guy with upside, college pitcher that's not going to take quite as long as the higher upside HS guy. Plus, I figure there's enough HS pitching, that we can find a guy in the 2nd or 3rd for less money that's not THAT much different, in terms of potential. I'm legitimately fine ANY direction this group goes though, they've certainly earned benefit of the doubt. Its just fascinating to me, because budget, upside vs floor, proximity.....It all factors in and how they use 27, inherently affects 30, those 2 picks inherently affect 67, and so on. Its a puzzle of talent accumulation, where you may be deciding between scenarios of 18, 24, and 97 on your board, with full slot left foir the rest of your draft, versus 11, 16, 142, and down a bit of money for the rest.....With potential foir the same decisions in 3-10. I'd love to see an actual draft board, because this group is going to have tons of scenarios for everything obviously.