I think the Cubs blend it all, which is the approach I would take. I'm not sure how much statistical analysis they do, but their attitude seems to be to take the best available player, regardless of whether he's a high school or college product. You also don't see them overdrafting toolsy players whose production has fallen well short of their physical gifts. It has to be a blend. You can't go all tools or all stats, or all college or all high school, because you're going to miss a lot of good players if you take a very narrow approach. If more teams go heavily after college players, then high school players may provided markedly better values in the second, third, fourth rounds, etc., in the future. I recently did a story on the high school/college debate (http://www.baseballamerica.com/online/draft/draft0311.html) and concluded that in the long run, there's little different between the two crops. College players are cheaper and develop quicker, but high school players are just as likely to become big league regulars and slightly more likely to become above-average big leaguers.