I think there's a happy medium. Guys like Brennamen and Harrelson have a tendency to excessively whine and complain, almost even bash other teams. There could be a little bit of rose colored glasses here, but Len doesn't really go there. When I think "homer" I think of someone who calls the game based more on a rooting interested than what is actually going on. Of course there should be a slight bias, but not to the extent that some guys call a game. Why not? Their intended audience are fans of the team they work for. Because I want to hear a legitimate broadcast, not a cheer-leading squad. Guys like Harrelson and Brennaman, Harrelson being the absolute extreme can ruin an entire broadcast, even if you are on their side. Hawk and Brennaman are hacks and have plenty of examples of being "cheerleaders," but I'm still baffled as to why you're complaining when that happens when their team wins in walk-off fashion. It would be one thing if you were showing a clip of him calling a Reds home run like that yet they were still down by God knows how many runs and had no chance to win, but come on...complaining that they're being too excited or "homers" over a walk-off win is [expletive] ridiculous. I guess I just think the call is stupid. DID HE DID HE DID HE HE DID HE DID HE DID REDS WIN REDS WIN REDS WIN If he would have kept it to one "HE DID" and one "REDS WIN," I personally think it would have sounded better.(I know that's really nitpicky, haha) The point of starting the thread is more of an overall shot at guys like Brennaman and Harrelson, I guess. This incident just sparked my frustration.