If they screened the questions properly, we would never hear about how much he hates Wood and Prior questions because he would never receive them. I understand the jaded bit, but I mean come on. If you constantly insult the people who are reading your reports and boo-hooing at every perceived slight by the Cubs organization, who are you doing a service to? I've become convinced that Sullivan's work is largely schtick intentionally designed to give the impression that the Trib isn't providing biased coverage towards the team they in fact own. Just to play devil's advocate on this, say Bruce Miles had his articles published by the Tribune. Would the perception be that his work was biased? Probably not, which goes back to the overall bitterness and some times sensationalistic quality of Paul Sullivan's work. Bruce Miles work is for a different organization. A different organization = different expectations or requirements. I'm not in any way trying to defend the drivel that is usually the tenor of Sullivan's work. I'm simply suggesting that he has his job because the Trib likes his 'unbiased' Cubs coverage. Yes, I would imagine he has a job because the Tribune wants him to. Hard to come to any other conclusion than that. We're talking about him on here, so I guess he would say "you're reading it," and that's the primary job he has: get people to read it. You got us there. We now have a 4 page (and growing) thread on one of his articles. Must now go shower! :lol: