In this day and age I always hate to see a team move a young, inexpensive better than average arm for any position player - mostly because even better than average pitching is just so dang hard to come by and in the long run it's pretty tough to win a championship just by bashing the ball - you need the good starting pitching in most cases. If we had a guy or two of very good talent ready to come up to the big club and pitch, I would say Zambrano would be one of the few players we have who could truly bring us good talent in return in a trade, but I don't see us having those arms down on the farm to replace, and I dislike the idea of trying to build a winning team by overpaying for free agent pitchers. The Cubs really have alot of options open to them and quite a bit depends on what happens before the trade deadline. It's my wish more than anything that we either have a very hot streak and force Hendry's hand to make a good deal or two that puts us back on the map as serious contenders, or I hope we have a terrible losing streak that forces us to play some youngers to see what they can do for us in 2006 and trade a little of our big club talent for things that might help us in 2006/2007. The worst thing that could happen is that we flounder through until the end of the month and we either sit still and not do anything, or we make some desperation moves. Back to the question - would I trade Z for Abreu - yes, I think deep down I would do that, but it would seriously hinge on me finding a really good arm somewhere that would help us right away next year (be that as a free agent or whatever). Gambling is all risk and reward - the higher the risk, the higher the potential reward. It's risky to give up Z because he has the potential to be the next ace starter, but if you get something back that's a "known" quantity like Abreu, it's certainly something to think about. In most cases, I would rather risk the potential talent for a known commodity. You just have to be able to stomach the fact that you might be trading a Lou Brock for Ernie Broglio now and then - I think in the long run though, as long as you evalute the "known" commodity you are trading for correctly, you end up on the winning side of those trades more often than not. Sorry for the long winded answer :-(