While Vitters' fielding percentage has never approached good, this season it has really fallen off a cliff. Same for his range. Do you think it could have anything to do with the Cubs playing him at first? Here are his numbers for the last couple years: Year Fld% Range 2008 .909 2.65 2009 .918 2.25 2010 .905 2.18 2011 .859 1.88 Last year, he had a .912 fielding percentage and 2.48 range factor at Daytona before going to .902 and 2.07 at Tennessee. Are there any factors that could have contributed to this? Any idea of how well respected the coaching staff at Tennessee is with regards to infield defense? I understand playing Vitters at first in a third of his games, as they have, if: 1. They think he's an option there over the next two years AND 2. They are seeing clear signs that he can't hack it at third 3. They need to get another guy ready to play third next year (not even convinced this is a good enough reason) If they still think he's got a shot at third I think they need to play him there every day to give him a chance to learn the position. I'm much more confident that he could play third on a contender than first, so why not give him a chance to fail until the dream is completely buried? I can see moving around guys like Lemahieu and Flaherty, because they likely will both outgrow the positions they have enough bat for. But unless 1 and 2 above are true, this seems more like a Jay Jackson "let's see if he can do it" or "we need to get Lemahieu some reps at third in case he can't hack second." As a couple have noted above, Flaherty's bat seems much closer to being able to hold down third for a year, but they're not even playing him there. So unless they plan to play Lemahieu at third next year, I really don't know what they're doing with third at Tennessee. But that's a bit of a tangent. The question I've got is does anyone see any reason for Vitters' defensive nose dive this season other than him just sucking?