If we take a step down in years and money, here are the recent contracts/players we'd be looking at getting (age is when they signed): (note: I limited it to free agents or players who were traded and then re-signed, eliminating the hometown discount issue. I also focused only on $100+ mil contracts since you're not going to see an established elite hitter sign for less) Jayson Werth, 31, 7/129 ($21 mil/yr) - avg WAR: 2.75 Alex Rodriguez, 33, 10/275 ($27 mil/yr) - avg WAR: 7.0 Mark Teixeira, 29, 8/180 ($22.5 mil/yr) - avg WAR: 4.6 Miguel Cabrera, 25, 8/152 ($19 mil/yr) - avg WAR: 4.7 Carlos Beltran, 28, 7/119 ($17 mil/yr) - avg WAR: 4.2 Matt Holliday, 30, 7/120 ($17 mil/yr) - avg WAR: 5.1 Carlos Lee, 31, 6/100 ($16 mil/yr) - avg WAR: 2.5 Vernon Wells, 30, 7/126 ($18 mil/yr) - avg WAR: 2 Adrian Gonzalez, 28, 7/154 ($22 mil/yr) - avg WAR: 3.2 Albert Pujols, 31, 10/300 ($30 mil/yr) - avg WAR: 8.0 (hypothetical contract) I limited it to players somewhat similar to Pujols - power hitters, primarily corner guys - and I left out some pretty dreadful contracts (like Ryan Howard's). None of the players on that list, save for ARod, have been close to as productive as Pujols. Most of them have barely been half as good as Pujols over their careers (all careers have lasted nearly 10 years). So we can sign a guy for less than what we'd have to give for Pujols, but we're going to get production similar to that dropoff. Basically, Pujols could fall off a cliff from his current production and be half as good as he is now for the entire second half of his contract and still be nearly as good as, or better than, most of the guys on that list. What kind of a free agent deal are you looking to give out? Should the downward trend in attendance persist, how much would you amend your offer?