The U.S. has the most developed amateur baseball system in the world. By the time kids reach 12 years old, they have been exposed to more organized baseball then any Latin nation, including Venezuela. Also, the diet of our post-industrial society matures adolescents more completely than third world countries. Because of these factors, high dollar contracts for U.S. amateurs is safer with greater return on value than high dollar contracts on Latin amateurs. Remember, 16 year old Latin kids are not scouted on baseball skills, as much as the physical skills that may translate to baseball skills. Few show the present ability to hit a baseball, throw and catch a baseball or run the base paths in an organized fashion. I have no problem with the, "sign low dollar kids and see what sticks" mentality. For me, this has the best value of return on such unknown quantities. Can anyone come up with a list of the Latin bonus babies that are now major league regulars? My guess, the list is small. I do have a theory on why teams (other than huge markets like N.Y. or Boston that have the cash) sign big bonus babies - its a marketing tool to show fans, other teams and maybe organizational employees that upper management is serious about player development. As a fan, I don't need the Cubs to show they are serious in developing homegrown talent by signing one or more of these kids. There are many tools these days to follow an organization's minor league talent base. If anything, these tools expose the realities of Latin baseball talent. With all the money thrown around the last few years on Latin kids, PEDs have become a serious problem with top prospects. BA has eluded to this problem in conjunction with the slow signings of the current 16/17 year old Latin elites. I think the Cubs are wise to stay away from Latin Kids with agents wanting big dollars. And don't forget the scandals of agents scamming these kids with huge cuts from the contracts. The incentive to cheat is greater now than is the past. Big money = big corruption, add in impoverished, minimally educated kids and the big bets on return don't add up.