Why do you believe secondhand accounts of illegally leaked grand jury testimony, but not firsthand accounts from an eyewitness/collaborator. Like I said, I'm not sure WHAT to believe. Personally, I'd let Bonds, McGwire, AND Sosa in the Hall of Fame. McGwire has been scrutinized plenty, and so has Bonds. I'm not sure what the Fox reporter was getting at. It's not like people haven't taken shots at McGwire. Well I'll agree with you on one thing....McGwire, Sosa and Bonds are all linked. Either they all go or none do. I say none. You say all. While I disagree, it's just a matter of interpreting the evidence and the what we want in an HOF inductee differently. What about the players who used amphetamines? You know, I'm honestly not sure. But Bonds, McGwire and Sosa are a little bit victims of their own success here. The 3 of them were so successful, that the spotlight shines more brightly on them than others. None of them have confessed or apologized, but have made excuses and dodged direct answers. There's some PR involved in getting a HOF election, and the 3 of them have played that game poorly. Not only do I think those 3 shouldn't be in there, but I don't think they WILL be. I think this is an opportunity for the baseball writers to flex their muscles and keep these guys out. I also don't think Giambi or Palmerio should make it.