I would put the Cubs' list in the middle of the pack, which is, in my opinion, a clear reflection on the performance of the team over those years. When you look outside of the first few rounds, it all becomes a numbers game. Around 1200 players are drafted, the elite make up the first 40 or so, which leaves, depending on your take, let's say 1000 other draftees who are all good college players. It's also a matter of timing, from being a backup to being traded. I believe most of the players drafted, other than those in the first few rounds, don't have huge signing bonuses and also live on only a few thousand dollars a month, at the most. "Worth spending the money", I was nder the impressionthat the Cubs had one of the strongest financial backings, which would make it worthwhile. As I had stated earlier, it's a numbers game with the players drafted later on and eventually it should pay off. You mention "what happens to all these players", every team has a list similar to this one, and there are only a limited number of spots in the bigs. Also, we all know what happens with those who have signability problems, there are problems with these palyers, which teams and management do not like to deal with. So in my opinion, let them slide.