I think the focus has been on Crawford's deal. Well, I admit to bugging out a little about this one too, though not nearly as much as Crow's deal. I just don't like these longer deals when there are bigger issues that will need to be dealt with down the road. And I'm not comfortable with the argument that we needed to give him this because he would have gotten more somewhere else. That doesn't mean it's a good idea for this team to give him that contract. He's a very solid stay-at-home defenseman, a good #3-4 guy. But with our high-end money guys, a $4/yr #3-4 defenseman may not be something we can afford. As someone else said, if the cap goes up as people expect it to, in two years we'll probably look at this signing as a great move.