I wouldn't object to a sale to Cuban. My intent wasn't to start another thread about that, not exactly. When a company neeeds to raise a large amount of cash, that company can either sell assets or borrow. The Tribune Comapny was trying to take the debt route, with the cash being used to by back shares to boost the price of the remaining shares. But of course that means taking a certain risk that the actual cash flow willl improve to the point where the debt could be paid off. It's pretty interesting that a major shareholder group, the Chandlers, who would certainly benefit from a higher share price, are objecting to this strategy. They must feel that the turn around strategy of the management won't work, that the debt won't be repaid, and the company gets dissolved. So this leaves the strategy of selling assets. So which type of asset wil bring more cash, one which is making money or one which is losing money? If the Trib were to sell off the losers, about all it's got left are the broadcast assets and the Cubs. My strategy would be to forget about the buyback, sell off some of the losers, and reinvest the proceeds in some of the more promising parts of the company. But yeah, Cuban for owner!