because what can be done with the extra 5M could possibly improve the team more than just having Schmidt. I also have seen nothing on Lilly being offered 10M, more in the 8-9 range. his agent is on the record as saying he wants Washburn money, ie 9M/year. While in a normal offseason year i'd tend to agree with you, this year, the player talent available in free agency is pretty thin. The drop off between the A free agents and the B free agents is pretty steep. I also dont see where you'd make up for the talent difference between Lilly and Schmidt in free agency elsewhere. you might not see it, but there are a myriad of ways to keep improving the team via free agents. it will come down to a matter of preference of course, but improvement is out there, even in this limited talent market. you are also not seeing other ways the extra money could be used, ie. allowing you to release Izturis or using that extra money in getting a player from a team dumping salary. again, it's all each posters preference, but to close out the debate because you don't see a better way to improve the team is a little silly. I was simply going on past practices, the "usual" way things get done around here would be that we go out and sign Lilly at 9m and go out and get more mediocre talent with the other 6m.(See Neifi Perez and Glendone Rusch) This team has a history of doing those sorts of things. I prefer the way they seem to be doing things now as with the Soriano signing. If you have the money sign the best. I also was just talking about pitching and free agency, I am in no way talking about trades. I am not a fortune teller. If a number two pitcher is available through trades at a cheaper cost and allowed us to go out and sign Lugo through free agency, with the extra money, then I'd be all for that over signing Schmidt for 15M per.