I'm getting a sense of deja vu about this thread. Hasn't the merits of Dunn over, well, everyone else been argued many times before? Why not discuss who you'd rather have between Crawford and Dunn? Why even keep bringing up Dunn actually? So, before I'm accused of contradicting myself, ignore that one sentence where I talked about Dunn and Crawford. Dunn's not goin' anywhere. And, most Reds fans that I've talked to, say they'd be glad to be rid of him. High OBP or not, I can see how a string of 0-3, BB and 0-4 lines interrupted by the occasional 1-4, HR would start to get old, even for Cub fans used to Matt Murton production. Especially, when you factor in Dunn's defense in the OF. Why not discuss Crawford vs. Lee or Lee against some other players that are supposedly available. The fact that Dunn is brought into every discussion(that's the perception, fair or not) on this board keeps many people away from here. People that could provide different point of views and open up new avenues of discussion. I'm just sayin'. But, I'd probably take Dunn only because he's younger than Lee.