. Murton has played in only a few games, I'm not sure how many. He's doing great. That being said, I'm not ready to declare him the starting left fielder. As far as Cedeno over Perez I would like to see Cedeno get more starts, but I understand Dusty's point. Neifi is a prove4n player, Cedeno is not. YOu just don't junk a proven player over an unproven talent. Neifi is a bench player through and through, but we're not sure what Cedeno is yet. Anyway, I want Nomar back. And, I watch pretty much every game in my capacity as a lazy college student. Just because a few rookies came up and got a few hits doesn't mean I'm ready to declare them the answer to all the Cub's problems. Once again, I like Murton and Cedeno a lot. But, experience counts more in my book than RAW, UNTRIED talent. If Murton proves himself a little more (and he's well on his way to doing that, at least in my eyes) great! Cedeno could be the man to, I don't know yet. But, just because Neifi isn't batting .350 anymore doesn't mean I'm ready to junk him. This isn't an attack on you by any means, but are you saying that you think experience is more important even if that experience isn't good. So by what you are saying it would make more sense for Dusty to call C-Pat up and play him everyday instead of Murton. I mean I know C-Pat was doing terrible, but in the same token Hollandsworth has done just as bad if not worse. Yes Corey struck out WAY more times, but he had more hits, runs, stolen bases, and home runs. Basically what I am saying is that two thirds of our starting outfield was pathetic this season so the experience doesn't mean anything. If a rookie has more to offer than a player who hasn't played well thus far, the rookie should play. A lot of people are saying that Murton doesn't have the power to be a starting corner outfielder. Last I checked Todd Hollandsworth has absolutely no power. His slugging is under .400 and ops is under .700. So the one knock on Murton doesn't have any substantial weight because the player he would be playing for has the same knock on him. It boils down to Dusty Baker being stubborn. In spring training, Hendry was quoted as saying he wanted Ryan Dempster to close, but Dusty said he was going with his boy Hawk cause he has the stuff. When his boy continued to be terrible in the closers role, he kept throwing him out there. Think where we would be right now if Dempster had been closing the whole time like Hendry had suggested. We could easily be 3 or 4 games better than now which would put us in the lead or a tie for the WC. I don't have a problem with Dusty wanting to play vets when the vets are good, but I do have a prolem with him being so stubborn that he refuses to admit the vet is struggling and there are better options. Murton should be the starting left fielder til he shows that he is as bad or worse than Hollandsworth. You don't make the playoffs by playing experienced players over players that are better. At this point in time right now Murton is better. I'm not saying he is going to be great which I hope he is going to be, but I am saying that he is better right now than Hollandsworth for tomorrow's game. I want to make the playoffs, not have experienced bad players get playing time because they have been there before.