The Bears trade down to 9! Roster turnover/Offseason Thread

User avatar
jersey cubs fan
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 64647
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 6:38 pm
Location: Hoboken squat cobbler
x 4106
x 15282

The Bears trade down to 9! Roster turnover/Offseason Thread

Postby jersey cubs fan » Tue Nov 01, 2022 5:43 pm

Let the games have the game threads. The bears pay the bear tax. The churn is on.

Out with the old and in with other peoples old.

The claypool trade is the type of thing I’ve wanted them to do. Hope he sticks.
7 x
longhotsummer wrote:I realize now, any opposing viewpoint, will not be tolerated.

Bertz
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 6156
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2017 2:59 pm
x 2083
x 3316

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby Bertz » Tue Nov 01, 2022 5:46 pm

2 x

abmillis
All-Star
Posts: 1758
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 10:46 pm
Location: Bridgeport, IL
x 648
x 297

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby abmillis » Tue Nov 01, 2022 5:49 pm

Not sure I love giving up a 2nd rounder (per Schefter) but it's gotta be the Ravens pick, and he sure has the tools to be good.
0 x

User avatar
UMFan83
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 87816
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 8:42 pm
Location: Southport Ave
x 4963
x 8195
Contact:

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby UMFan83 » Tue Nov 01, 2022 5:52 pm

3 x
Win it for Fred

User avatar
UMFan83
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 87816
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 8:42 pm
Location: Southport Ave
x 4963
x 8195
Contact:

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby UMFan83 » Tue Nov 01, 2022 5:59 pm

Ugh...now they are saying it is the Bears 2nd rounder. Not as great
0 x
Win it for Fred

User avatar
David
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 64121
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 12:33 am
Location: Chicago
x 13358
x 7346

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby David » Tue Nov 01, 2022 6:00 pm

2 x

User avatar
David
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 64121
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 12:33 am
Location: Chicago
x 13358
x 7346

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby David » Tue Nov 01, 2022 6:02 pm

While I much preferred it being the Baltimore pick, particularly given the upcoming FA list, I'm more than OK with a bit of an overpay (and re-allocating resources toward offense) for a guy whose profile fits Justin well and who is still very young.

Maybe we can get lucky and have the Ravens stumble around a bit. NFL can be nuts.
1 x

User avatar
UMFan83
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 87816
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 8:42 pm
Location: Southport Ave
x 4963
x 8195
Contact:

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby UMFan83 » Tue Nov 01, 2022 6:03 pm

David wrote:https://twitter.com/JosinaAnderson/status/1587502660172894209?s=20&t=CweBWjF4PFacDN7uci-tjg


I bet the Packers were also offering a 2nd which is why the Bears had to offer their 2nd rounder to get it done.
2 x
Win it for Fred

User avatar
SpongeWorthy
Superstar
Posts: 13724
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:47 am
x 232
x 546

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby SpongeWorthy » Tue Nov 01, 2022 6:03 pm

UMFan83 wrote:Ugh...now they are saying it is the Bears 2nd rounder. Not as great

pretty wild overpay imo
1 x

User avatar
UMFan83
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 87816
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 8:42 pm
Location: Southport Ave
x 4963
x 8195
Contact:

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby UMFan83 » Tue Nov 01, 2022 6:04 pm

David wrote:While I much preferred it being the Baltimore pick, particularly given the upcoming FA list, I'm more than OK with a bit of an overpay (and re-allocating resources toward offense) for a guy whose profile fits Justin well and who is still very young.

Maybe we can get lucky and have the Ravens stumble around a bit. NFL can be nuts.


there's some value to locking in your big WR move right now. You get him in now, he learns the system and develops rapport with Fields. And now in the offseason you don't *have* to use a 1st on a WR, though you can, and you don't have to worry about the thin WR market as much.
3 x
Win it for Fred

User avatar
jersey cubs fan
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 64647
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 6:38 pm
Location: Hoboken squat cobbler
x 4106
x 15282

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby jersey cubs fan » Tue Nov 01, 2022 6:05 pm

UMFan83 wrote:
David wrote:https://twitter.com/JosinaAnderson/status/1587502660172894209?s=20&t=CweBWjF4PFacDN7uci-tjg


I bet the Packers were also offering a 2nd which is why the Bears had to offer their 2nd rounder to get it done.
god I hope the packers end up picking one pick before this bears/Steelers pick
0 x
longhotsummer wrote:I realize now, any opposing viewpoint, will not be tolerated.

BigSlick
Superstar
Posts: 15199
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 7:04 pm
x 3735
x 685

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby BigSlick » Tue Nov 01, 2022 6:08 pm

Dunno if it’s an overpay or not but I dig how willing this admin is to mix it up and be bold.

Very interested to see how Fields and him gel. Mooney has been great and dependable but I don’t think has the tools to ever be a 1, but can be a great 2 receiver.
1 x
Image
"The only good sabermetrician is a dead one." --Andrew Jackson, 1776.

I have to admit its getting better...it can't get no worse - The Beatles (On the Cubs)

User avatar
UMFan83
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 87816
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 8:42 pm
Location: Southport Ave
x 4963
x 8195
Contact:

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby UMFan83 » Tue Nov 01, 2022 6:08 pm

It's kind of crazy though. Claypool was the 49th overall pick in 2020. He's been good but hasn't become a star (though has the ability to become one) and he's 1.5 years from FA. How often do you see someone in a situation like that traded for a better pick than the one used to select them? Definitely a win-win deal for both sides. Steelers have to be thrilled.
0 x
Win it for Fred

User avatar
pitchcs
All-Star
Posts: 3999
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 4:22 am
Location: A block from Wrigley
x 16
x 52
Contact:

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby pitchcs » Tue Nov 01, 2022 6:21 pm

SpongeWorthy wrote:
UMFan83 wrote:Ugh...now they are saying it is the Bears 2nd rounder. Not as great

pretty wild overpay imo


Agreed, unfortunately.
0 x

User avatar
WrigleyField 22
Superstar
Posts: 18932
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 10:48 pm
Location: This is the Bad Place
x 7594
x 3476
Contact:

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby WrigleyField 22 » Tue Nov 01, 2022 6:26 pm

Objectively a steep price, but I'm okay with it.

Poles hasn't fleeced anyone in any deal, but when you look at the context of all the trades together, I like the direction.
2 x
Image

User avatar
Cubswin11
Hall of Fame
Posts: 29457
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 8:17 pm
x 10706
x 6836

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby Cubswin11 » Tue Nov 01, 2022 6:28 pm

May be a slight overpay, but he has the tools to be a guy. He also had Big Ben’s corpse, Mitch and Picketts throwing to him his whole career. As mentioned with the weak WR FA market seems like a decent move and doesn’t box you in to forcing some draft pick/FA/other trade (where maybe you have to give up more given the WR market) in the offseason. Like I’d rather give up a second for him than a first for Jeudy or Higgins (just two of the guys that seem to be rumored to be moved).
Last edited by Cubswin11 on Tue Nov 01, 2022 6:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
3 x
Screw Pitchers

User avatar
Old Style
Superstar
Posts: 11502
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 4:57 pm
Location: Bedford, TX
x 9323
x 1292

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby Old Style » Tue Nov 01, 2022 6:30 pm

It also keeps him from going to the Packers which is nice.
1 x
"I'm sorry, folks outside of SEC country, but a few facts are incontrovertible. They smoke better barbecue than you. Their women are prettier than your women. They play football better than your schools play football." - Andy Staples, SI

User avatar
bukie
Hall of Fame
Posts: 20157
Joined: Sat May 31, 2003 4:17 am
Location: Mokena, IL
x 50
x 3168
Contact:

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby bukie » Tue Nov 01, 2022 6:34 pm

Old Style wrote:It also keeps him from going to the Packers which is nice.

First solid defensive play by the Bears franchise in 2 weeks.
8 x
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to convince the world he didn't exist.

abmillis
All-Star
Posts: 1758
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 10:46 pm
Location: Bridgeport, IL
x 648
x 297

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby abmillis » Tue Nov 01, 2022 6:41 pm

Cubswin11 wrote:May be a slight overpay, but he has the tools to be a guy. He also had Big Ben’s corpse, Mitch and Picketts throwing to him his whole career.


I think this is an underrated consideration. If Fields can dial up some good deep balls - which I do think is still a strength of his - Claypool has the size and speed to make plays. Those 3 QBs in Pittsburgh (considering Ben's late-career limitations) don't have nearly the tools that Fields has
5 x

User avatar
David
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 64121
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 12:33 am
Location: Chicago
x 13358
x 7346

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby David » Tue Nov 01, 2022 6:46 pm



inject it into my veins
4 x

Tryptamine
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 7372
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:13 pm
x 17
x 639

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby Tryptamine » Tue Nov 01, 2022 6:50 pm

Guy who nobody likes, interviews guy who nobody likes.
0 x

User avatar
WrigleyField 22
Superstar
Posts: 18932
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 10:48 pm
Location: This is the Bad Place
x 7594
x 3476
Contact:

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby WrigleyField 22 » Tue Nov 01, 2022 6:52 pm

Cubswin11 wrote:May be a slight overpay, but he has the tools to be a guy. He also had Big Ben’s corpse, Mitch and Picketts throwing to him his whole career. As mentioned with the weak WR FA market seems like a decent move and doesn’t box you in to forcing some draft pick/FA/other trade (where maybe you have to give up more given the WR market) in the offseason. Like I’d rather give up a second for him than a first for Jeudy or Higgins (just two of the guys that seem to be rumored to be moved).

Definitely an overpay, and really not slight either.

But I'll take thr past 24 hours 10 times out 10 for where the Bears are and need to be. It's a lot, but better than sitting still would have been.

Excited to watch the back 9 games now that Fields has another solid weapon. Line still suspect, but I think options open up.
0 x
Image

Tryptamine
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 7372
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:13 pm
x 17
x 639

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby Tryptamine » Tue Nov 01, 2022 6:53 pm

I like what this does for the draft. It basically makes the first round pick either DL or a trade back to fill multiple holes and I don't have a problem with either option.
4 x

User avatar
bukie
Hall of Fame
Posts: 20157
Joined: Sat May 31, 2003 4:17 am
Location: Mokena, IL
x 50
x 3168
Contact:

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby bukie » Tue Nov 01, 2022 6:54 pm

David wrote:https://twitter.com/RobDemovsky/status/1587513183941656576?s=20&t=CweBWjF4PFacDN7uci-tjg

inject it into my veins

He may own the Bears, but he doesn't own any NFL WRs.
6 x
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to convince the world he didn't exist.

User avatar
UMFan83
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 87816
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 8:42 pm
Location: Southport Ave
x 4963
x 8195
Contact:

Re: Bears roster turnover

Postby UMFan83 » Tue Nov 01, 2022 6:58 pm

Less relevant now after the Claypool trade, but the Jags are trading for Ridley



Looks like a 2024 2nd rounder and a pick that based on incentives can be as high as a 5th rounder in 2023.
1 x
Win it for Fred


Return to “Other Sports”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], SouthSideRyan, Thurman Merman and 6 guests