TV thread
Re: TV thread
yeah that episode was super touching, id take a full season of those two
0 x
Duke Silver wrote:You've never been right about anything. You bitch and moan at the slightest hint of things not going right ... Suck my ass, you whiny little bitch.
- Banedon
- Curse You!
- Posts: 70230
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 9:36 pm
- Location: Kidding Myself
- x 8908
- x 8562
Re: TV thread
Finished watching Wednesday last night and I really did NOT expect to enjoy that show as much as I did!
0 x
Re: TV thread
UMFan83 wrote:
Beautiful hour of TV. I sort of knew this episode was coming and beforehand I thought it might have been a bad decision to spend an hour on a character who doesn't appear in the story before or after, but after seeing it I completely get why it makes total sense and loved it.
I don't know if it made "total" sense and I usually loathe episodes like this one where the 10 minutes of plot progression takes over an hour of screen time but it was absolutely one of the best single episodes of a TV/Streaming series I think I have seen. Nick Offerman and Murray Bartlett were phenomenal. The use of "Long Long Time" was inspired. Whatever the opposite of jumping the shark is (ducking the emu?) this was it. I have almost zero awareness of the plot of the game so this "detour" is less jarring to me. I'll even forgive Nick Offerman walking down the middle of the road when being stormed by the raiders.
0 x
Stone added: "Lou's probably grumpy, because he only went 3-for-11 against me with no RBIs."
Re: TV thread
Banedon wrote:Finished watching Wednesday last night and I really did NOT expect to enjoy that show as much as I did!
Same here. I kept expecting it to go full CW and it never really did. I also expected Wednesday to epitomize "Mary Sue" and she was a complete horsefeathers and gets called out and held accountable for it. And she was wrong about so many things...so often. Much better than I anticipated.
0 x
Stone added: "Lou's probably grumpy, because he only went 3-for-11 against me with no RBIs."
-
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 25681
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:36 am
- x 1091
- x 3407
- Ding Dong Johnson
- Crap Bag
- Posts: 37254
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:42 am
- Location: Durnsville
- x 1278
- x 9580
- Sammy Sofa
- Licks Butts
- Posts: 90498
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:45 am
- Location: Washington DC
- x 22171
- x 23286
- Derwood
- Stall Monitor
- Posts: 78062
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 4:44 pm
- Location: 375 Miles East of Wrigley
- x 1970
- x 4908
Re: TV thread
My kid is watching "Willow" right now, and horsefeathers is the dialogue cringey. It sounds like it was written by a 17-year old
1 x
- Ding Dong Johnson
- Crap Bag
- Posts: 37254
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:42 am
- Location: Durnsville
- x 1278
- x 9580
Re: TV thread
Praise be all those who suggested watching Shrink on Peacock. Let's bring this show back.
0 x

-
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 27745
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 5:52 pm
- Location: Pike Road, Al
- x 1113
- x 2373
Re: TV thread
I still cannot get over that episode. It was perfect. Every shot, every line, every setting, every second.
0 x
-
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 27745
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 5:52 pm
- Location: Pike Road, Al
- x 1113
- x 2373
Re: TV thread
Derwood wrote:My kid is watching "Willow" right now, and horsefeathers is the dialogue cringey. It sounds like it was written by a 17-year old
I loved the movie, who didn’t. But the show reminded me of a WB show.
0 x
- Sammy Sofa
- Licks Butts
- Posts: 90498
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:45 am
- Location: Washington DC
- x 22171
- x 23286
Re: TV thread
CubinNY wrote:Derwood wrote:My kid is watching "Willow" right now, and horsefeathers is the dialogue cringey. It sounds like it was written by a 17-year old
I loved the movie, who didn’t.
Plenty of adults who saw it at the time; it got pretty middling reviews, and mostly lived on as a bit of a joke until the kids who saw it got old enough to do their usual "if I liked it as a kid, it MUST be amazing!" thing (and I say that as someone who really enjoys the movie, but it is mid as hell).
But the show reminded me of a WB show.
The show is pretty clearly aiming for a younger audience. I ended up enjoying it more than I thought I would; felt like a bunch of middle schoolers playing a D&D campaign. It's just OK, and that's OK.
1 x
- WrigleyField 22
- Superstar
- Posts: 18962
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 10:48 pm
- Location: This is the Bad Place
- x 7645
- x 3511
- Contact:
Re: TV thread
Sammy Sofa wrote:CubinNY wrote:Derwood wrote:My kid is watching "Willow" right now, and horsefeathers is the dialogue cringey. It sounds like it was written by a 17-year old
I loved the movie, who didn’t.
Plenty of adults who saw it at the time; it got pretty middling reviews, and mostly lived on as a bit of a joke until the kids who saw it got old enough to do their usual "if I liked it as a kid, it MUST be amazing!" thing (and I say that as someone who really enjoys the movie, but it is mid as hell).But the show reminded me of a WB show.
The show is pretty clearly aiming for a younger audience. I ended up enjoying it more than I thought I would; felt like a bunch of middle schoolers playing a D&D campaign. It's just OK, and that's OK.
Yep, pretty much my feelings on all of it.
1 x

- WrigleyField 22
- Superstar
- Posts: 18962
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 10:48 pm
- Location: This is the Bad Place
- x 7645
- x 3511
- Contact:
- Derwood
- Stall Monitor
- Posts: 78062
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 4:44 pm
- Location: 375 Miles East of Wrigley
- x 1970
- x 4908
Re: TV thread
WrigleyField 22 wrote:Waiting for NFLX to tank...
That doesn't fix password sharing at all. If I use Netflix at least once per month then my kid in college can share my password? Ok, easy
0 x
-
- 5-Time All-Star
- Posts: 8661
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:53 pm
- Location: Hell (a.k.a. St. Louis)
- x 444
- x 568
- Contact:
Re: TV thread
That's not what it says. You have to log the device being used onto your home network at least once a month, so a Firestick or Roku 500 miles away won't work.
1 x
I like beer.
- UMFan83
- Inner-Circle HOF
- Posts: 87850
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 8:42 pm
- Location: Southport Ave
- x 4976
- x 8213
- Contact:
Re: TV thread
Derwood wrote:WrigleyField 22 wrote:Waiting for NFLX to tank...
That doesn't fix password sharing at all. If I use Netflix at least once per month then my kid in college can share my password? Ok, easy
The article is saying that any device using the Netflix account has to log in while using the home network. So your kid in college would have to bring his device using Netflix home every 30 days or your entire account is banned.
Edit: or maybe just the device is banned, not the app entire account
1 x
Win it for Fred
- WrigleyField 22
- Superstar
- Posts: 18962
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 10:48 pm
- Location: This is the Bad Place
- x 7645
- x 3511
- Contact:
Re: TV thread
UMFan83 wrote:Derwood wrote:WrigleyField 22 wrote:Waiting for NFLX to tank...
That doesn't fix password sharing at all. If I use Netflix at least once per month then my kid in college can share my password? Ok, easy
The article is saying that any device using the Netflix account has to log in while using the home network. So your kid in college would have to bring his device using Netflix home every 30 days or your entire account is banned.
Edit: or maybe just the device is banned, not the app entire account
Yea I think just the device is blocked. Presumably blocked just from that one account, but would be pretty hilarious if it bricks an entire device from using their app.
Like - obvious privelege scenario, but just say you're a person who has two homes. While you can of course hold two subscriptions, those accounts aren't linked. So when you stop watching in location one you can't pick up again from location two where you left off. And just generally a huge turnoff for people who for example travel a lot (and may primarily watch on a device like a tablet while traveling and then a fixed smart device at home)
Like on some level, if they are insistent on cracking down on sharing (lame still, but whatever), it should just be you have a profile that you can own for free and then you go access that profile from any "box" that pays for the streaming access. It would at least create a lot less friction for users and allow them to keep content they curate even if they move among households. The way it's done here seems 100% destined to just turn people away.
0 x

- Ding Dong Johnson
- Crap Bag
- Posts: 37254
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:42 am
- Location: Durnsville
- x 1278
- x 9580
Re: TV thread
The smart move would be to provide better content and let the moochers mooch away.
4 x

- WrigleyField 22
- Superstar
- Posts: 18962
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 10:48 pm
- Location: This is the Bad Place
- x 7645
- x 3511
- Contact:
Re: TV thread
Bertz wrote:The smart move would be not to ban mooch accounts, just subject them to ads.
Well they did come out with an ad version. Which I thought about doing anyway to save a couple bucks (need those ad breaks to properly scroll my phone anyways).
But yea, you could probably do a combo of both. Like the premium package that allows 4 devices is $20 compared to 1 device at $10 or add supported 1 device at $7. The fact they're okay with 4 devices under one roof at a time, but can't have 4 locations under one plan...?
Make it make sense (you can't)
0 x

Re: TV thread
mul21 wrote:That's not what it says. You have to log the device being used onto your home network at least once a month, so a Firestick or Roku 500 miles away won't work.
How is a "Home" network determined?
0 x
Stone added: "Lou's probably grumpy, because he only went 3-for-11 against me with no RBIs."
- WrigleyField 22
- Superstar
- Posts: 18962
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 10:48 pm
- Location: This is the Bad Place
- x 7645
- x 3511
- Contact:
Re: TV thread
chopsx9 wrote:mul21 wrote:That's not what it says. You have to log the device being used onto your home network at least once a month, so a Firestick or Roku 500 miles away won't work.
How is a "Home" network determined?
From article / Netflix faq
Netflix uses information such as IP addresses, device IDs, and account activity to determine whether a device signed into your account is connected at your primary location.
0 x

- Sammy Sofa
- Licks Butts
- Posts: 90498
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:45 am
- Location: Washington DC
- x 22171
- x 23286
Re: TV thread
Yeah, but how do they know what the "primary location" is? What if I signed up for Netflix while on vacation? Is my "primary location" the dumb hotel where I first signed on to Netflix?
0 x
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Hairyducked Idiot and 2 guests