TV thread

Elon Musk
Formerly imb!
Posts: 34770
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 7:57 am
x 5011
x 10061
Contact:

Re: TV thread

Postby Elon Musk » Mon Jan 30, 2023 7:55 pm

yeah that episode was super touching, id take a full season of those two
0 x
Duke Silver wrote:You've never been right about anything. You bitch and moan at the slightest hint of things not going right ... Suck my ass, you whiny little bitch.

User avatar
Banedon
Curse You!
Posts: 70230
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 9:36 pm
Location: Kidding Myself
x 8908
x 8562

Re: TV thread

Postby Banedon » Mon Jan 30, 2023 11:20 pm

Finished watching Wednesday last night and I really did NOT expect to enjoy that show as much as I did!
0 x

chopsx9
Starter
Posts: 763
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:22 am
x 71
x 132

Re: TV thread

Postby chopsx9 » Tue Jan 31, 2023 5:54 am

UMFan83 wrote:
Bertz wrote:That was another beautiful hour of TV.

Spoiler: show
I think generally it made a lot of sense to take a bigger swing away from the source material here of all places too. The Bill stuff was fun in the game more for game play than for story reasons.

Also are we going to get a bunch of nerd rage over tonight's episode? I feel like it was implied pretty strongly that Bill and Frank were a thing but never explicit. The types of dudes who would hate tonight's episode are the exact types to completely whiff on all that subtext.


Beautiful hour of TV. I sort of knew this episode was coming and beforehand I thought it might have been a bad decision to spend an hour on a character who doesn't appear in the story before or after, but after seeing it I completely get why it makes total sense and loved it.


I don't know if it made "total" sense and I usually loathe episodes like this one where the 10 minutes of plot progression takes over an hour of screen time but it was absolutely one of the best single episodes of a TV/Streaming series I think I have seen. Nick Offerman and Murray Bartlett were phenomenal. The use of "Long Long Time" was inspired. Whatever the opposite of jumping the shark is (ducking the emu?) this was it. I have almost zero awareness of the plot of the game so this "detour" is less jarring to me. I'll even forgive Nick Offerman walking down the middle of the road when being stormed by the raiders.
0 x
Stone added: "Lou's probably grumpy, because he only went 3-for-11 against me with no RBIs."

chopsx9
Starter
Posts: 763
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:22 am
x 71
x 132

Re: TV thread

Postby chopsx9 » Tue Jan 31, 2023 6:04 am

Banedon wrote:Finished watching Wednesday last night and I really did NOT expect to enjoy that show as much as I did!


Same here. I kept expecting it to go full CW and it never really did. I also expected Wednesday to epitomize "Mary Sue" and she was a complete horsefeathers and gets called out and held accountable for it. And she was wrong about so many things...so often. Much better than I anticipated.
0 x
Stone added: "Lou's probably grumpy, because he only went 3-for-11 against me with no RBIs."

17 Seconds
Hall of Fame
Posts: 25681
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:36 am
x 1091
x 3407

Re: TV thread

Postby 17 Seconds » Tue Jan 31, 2023 8:17 pm

episode 3 of tlou is a gd masterpiece
0 x

User avatar
Ding Dong Johnson
Crap Bag
Posts: 37254
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:42 am
Location: Durnsville
x 1278
x 9580

Re: TV thread

Postby Ding Dong Johnson » Tue Jan 31, 2023 8:22 pm

0 x
Image

User avatar
Sammy Sofa
Licks Butts
Posts: 90498
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:45 am
Location: Washington DC
x 22171
x 23286

Re: TV thread

Postby Sammy Sofa » Tue Jan 31, 2023 8:33 pm

Image
0 x

User avatar
Derwood
Stall Monitor
Posts: 78062
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 4:44 pm
Location: 375 Miles East of Wrigley
x 1970
x 4908

Re: TV thread

Postby Derwood » Wed Feb 01, 2023 12:11 am

My kid is watching "Willow" right now, and horsefeathers is the dialogue cringey. It sounds like it was written by a 17-year old
1 x

User avatar
Ding Dong Johnson
Crap Bag
Posts: 37254
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:42 am
Location: Durnsville
x 1278
x 9580

Re: TV thread

Postby Ding Dong Johnson » Wed Feb 01, 2023 12:30 am

Praise be all those who suggested watching Shrink on Peacock. Let's bring this show back.
0 x
Image

CubinNY
Hall of Fame
Posts: 27745
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 5:52 pm
Location: Pike Road, Al
x 1113
x 2373

Re: TV thread

Postby CubinNY » Wed Feb 01, 2023 12:43 am

I still cannot get over that episode. It was perfect. Every shot, every line, every setting, every second.
0 x

CubinNY
Hall of Fame
Posts: 27745
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 5:52 pm
Location: Pike Road, Al
x 1113
x 2373

Re: TV thread

Postby CubinNY » Wed Feb 01, 2023 12:45 am

Derwood wrote:My kid is watching "Willow" right now, and horsefeathers is the dialogue cringey. It sounds like it was written by a 17-year old

I loved the movie, who didn’t. But the show reminded me of a WB show.
0 x

User avatar
Sammy Sofa
Licks Butts
Posts: 90498
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:45 am
Location: Washington DC
x 22171
x 23286

Re: TV thread

Postby Sammy Sofa » Wed Feb 01, 2023 1:29 am

CubinNY wrote:
Derwood wrote:My kid is watching "Willow" right now, and horsefeathers is the dialogue cringey. It sounds like it was written by a 17-year old

I loved the movie, who didn’t.


Plenty of adults who saw it at the time; it got pretty middling reviews, and mostly lived on as a bit of a joke until the kids who saw it got old enough to do their usual "if I liked it as a kid, it MUST be amazing!" thing (and I say that as someone who really enjoys the movie, but it is mid as hell).

But the show reminded me of a WB show.


The show is pretty clearly aiming for a younger audience. I ended up enjoying it more than I thought I would; felt like a bunch of middle schoolers playing a D&D campaign. It's just OK, and that's OK.
1 x

User avatar
WrigleyField 22
Superstar
Posts: 18962
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 10:48 pm
Location: This is the Bad Place
x 7645
x 3511
Contact:

Re: TV thread

Postby WrigleyField 22 » Wed Feb 01, 2023 5:01 am

Sammy Sofa wrote:
CubinNY wrote:
Derwood wrote:My kid is watching "Willow" right now, and horsefeathers is the dialogue cringey. It sounds like it was written by a 17-year old

I loved the movie, who didn’t.


Plenty of adults who saw it at the time; it got pretty middling reviews, and mostly lived on as a bit of a joke until the kids who saw it got old enough to do their usual "if I liked it as a kid, it MUST be amazing!" thing (and I say that as someone who really enjoys the movie, but it is mid as hell).

But the show reminded me of a WB show.


The show is pretty clearly aiming for a younger audience. I ended up enjoying it more than I thought I would; felt like a bunch of middle schoolers playing a D&D campaign. It's just OK, and that's OK.

Yep, pretty much my feelings on all of it.
1 x
Image

User avatar
WrigleyField 22
Superstar
Posts: 18962
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 10:48 pm
Location: This is the Bad Place
x 7645
x 3511
Contact:

Re: TV thread

Postby WrigleyField 22 » Wed Feb 01, 2023 2:54 pm

Waiting for NFLX to tank...

0 x
Image

User avatar
Derwood
Stall Monitor
Posts: 78062
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 4:44 pm
Location: 375 Miles East of Wrigley
x 1970
x 4908

Re: TV thread

Postby Derwood » Wed Feb 01, 2023 4:05 pm

WrigleyField 22 wrote:Waiting for NFLX to tank...



That doesn't fix password sharing at all. If I use Netflix at least once per month then my kid in college can share my password? Ok, easy
0 x

mul21
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 8661
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:53 pm
Location: Hell (a.k.a. St. Louis)
x 444
x 568
Contact:

Re: TV thread

Postby mul21 » Wed Feb 01, 2023 4:12 pm

That's not what it says. You have to log the device being used onto your home network at least once a month, so a Firestick or Roku 500 miles away won't work.
1 x
I like beer.

User avatar
UMFan83
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 87850
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 8:42 pm
Location: Southport Ave
x 4976
x 8213
Contact:

Re: TV thread

Postby UMFan83 » Wed Feb 01, 2023 4:15 pm

Derwood wrote:
WrigleyField 22 wrote:Waiting for NFLX to tank...



That doesn't fix password sharing at all. If I use Netflix at least once per month then my kid in college can share my password? Ok, easy


The article is saying that any device using the Netflix account has to log in while using the home network. So your kid in college would have to bring his device using Netflix home every 30 days or your entire account is banned.

Edit: or maybe just the device is banned, not the app entire account
1 x
Win it for Fred

User avatar
Derwood
Stall Monitor
Posts: 78062
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 4:44 pm
Location: 375 Miles East of Wrigley
x 1970
x 4908

Re: TV thread

Postby Derwood » Wed Feb 01, 2023 4:25 pm

Ah, got it. My bad.
0 x

User avatar
WrigleyField 22
Superstar
Posts: 18962
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 10:48 pm
Location: This is the Bad Place
x 7645
x 3511
Contact:

Re: TV thread

Postby WrigleyField 22 » Wed Feb 01, 2023 4:29 pm

UMFan83 wrote:
Derwood wrote:
WrigleyField 22 wrote:Waiting for NFLX to tank...



That doesn't fix password sharing at all. If I use Netflix at least once per month then my kid in college can share my password? Ok, easy


The article is saying that any device using the Netflix account has to log in while using the home network. So your kid in college would have to bring his device using Netflix home every 30 days or your entire account is banned.

Edit: or maybe just the device is banned, not the app entire account

Yea I think just the device is blocked. Presumably blocked just from that one account, but would be pretty hilarious if it bricks an entire device from using their app.

Like - obvious privelege scenario, but just say you're a person who has two homes. While you can of course hold two subscriptions, those accounts aren't linked. So when you stop watching in location one you can't pick up again from location two where you left off. And just generally a huge turnoff for people who for example travel a lot (and may primarily watch on a device like a tablet while traveling and then a fixed smart device at home)

Like on some level, if they are insistent on cracking down on sharing (lame still, but whatever), it should just be you have a profile that you can own for free and then you go access that profile from any "box" that pays for the streaming access. It would at least create a lot less friction for users and allow them to keep content they curate even if they move among households. The way it's done here seems 100% destined to just turn people away.
0 x
Image

Bertz
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 6174
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2017 2:59 pm
x 2086
x 3321

Re: TV thread

Postby Bertz » Wed Feb 01, 2023 4:33 pm

The smart move would be not to ban mooch accounts, just subject them to ads.
0 x

User avatar
Ding Dong Johnson
Crap Bag
Posts: 37254
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:42 am
Location: Durnsville
x 1278
x 9580

Re: TV thread

Postby Ding Dong Johnson » Wed Feb 01, 2023 4:45 pm

The smart move would be to provide better content and let the moochers mooch away.
4 x
Image

User avatar
WrigleyField 22
Superstar
Posts: 18962
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 10:48 pm
Location: This is the Bad Place
x 7645
x 3511
Contact:

Re: TV thread

Postby WrigleyField 22 » Wed Feb 01, 2023 4:54 pm

Bertz wrote:The smart move would be not to ban mooch accounts, just subject them to ads.

Well they did come out with an ad version. Which I thought about doing anyway to save a couple bucks (need those ad breaks to properly scroll my phone anyways).

But yea, you could probably do a combo of both. Like the premium package that allows 4 devices is $20 compared to 1 device at $10 or add supported 1 device at $7. The fact they're okay with 4 devices under one roof at a time, but can't have 4 locations under one plan...?

Make it make sense (you can't)
0 x
Image

chopsx9
Starter
Posts: 763
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:22 am
x 71
x 132

Re: TV thread

Postby chopsx9 » Wed Feb 01, 2023 6:21 pm

mul21 wrote:That's not what it says. You have to log the device being used onto your home network at least once a month, so a Firestick or Roku 500 miles away won't work.

How is a "Home" network determined?
0 x
Stone added: "Lou's probably grumpy, because he only went 3-for-11 against me with no RBIs."

User avatar
WrigleyField 22
Superstar
Posts: 18962
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 10:48 pm
Location: This is the Bad Place
x 7645
x 3511
Contact:

Re: TV thread

Postby WrigleyField 22 » Wed Feb 01, 2023 6:47 pm

chopsx9 wrote:
mul21 wrote:That's not what it says. You have to log the device being used onto your home network at least once a month, so a Firestick or Roku 500 miles away won't work.

How is a "Home" network determined?


From article / Netflix faq
Netflix uses information such as IP addresses, device IDs, and account activity to determine whether a device signed into your account is connected at your primary location.
0 x
Image

User avatar
Sammy Sofa
Licks Butts
Posts: 90498
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:45 am
Location: Washington DC
x 22171
x 23286

Re: TV thread

Postby Sammy Sofa » Wed Feb 01, 2023 6:52 pm

Yeah, but how do they know what the "primary location" is? What if I signed up for Netflix while on vacation? Is my "primary location" the dumb hotel where I first signed on to Netflix?
0 x


Return to “Social”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Hairyducked Idiot and 2 guests