General Cubs Chit-Chat

Discuss the Chicago Cubs major league baseball team.
Tryptamine
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 7372
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:13 pm
x 17
x 639

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby Tryptamine » Thu Nov 17, 2022 6:51 pm

I really thought once the team completed the renovations the Cubs were basically guaranteed an ASG. I'd love to hear the justification for one of MLB's largest markets to get passed over year after year.
0 x

User avatar
UMFan83
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 87815
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 8:42 pm
Location: Southport Ave
x 4962
x 8193
Contact:

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby UMFan83 » Thu Nov 17, 2022 7:04 pm

Tryptamine wrote:I really thought once the team completed the renovations the Cubs were basically guaranteed an ASG. I'd love to hear the justification for one of MLB's largest markets to get passed over year after year.


MLB prefers to reward teams who get public money to complete stadiums/renovations. The Cubs took no public money and then spent 3+ years crying poor and fielding less competitive teams using the excuse (among others) that they took too much debt on. The Cubs will get one eventually but can't help feeling like they are being punished.

Boob reports that the Cubs along with the Jays, Orioles and Braves are the leading candidates for 2025.
0 x
Win it for Fred

User avatar
Cubswin11
Hall of Fame
Posts: 29457
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 8:17 pm
x 10706
x 6836

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby Cubswin11 » Thu Nov 17, 2022 8:05 pm

Almost have to wonder if Ricketts are holding it off to finish some more development around the stadium to maximize revenue (idk what they have left or going on but would assume they still have some projects going) as a reason we haven’t gotten it yet.
0 x
Screw Pitchers

Tryptamine
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 7372
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:13 pm
x 17
x 639

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby Tryptamine » Thu Nov 17, 2022 8:10 pm

UMFan83 wrote:
Tryptamine wrote:I really thought once the team completed the renovations the Cubs were basically guaranteed an ASG. I'd love to hear the justification for one of MLB's largest markets to get passed over year after year.


MLB prefers to reward teams who get public money to complete stadiums/renovations. The Cubs took no public money and then spent 3+ years crying poor and fielding less competitive teams using the excuse (among others) that they took too much debt on. The Cubs will get one eventually but can't help feeling like they are being punished.

Boob reports that the Cubs along with the Jays, Orioles and Braves are the leading candidates for 2025.


I'd bet the Braves after losing the ASG previously through no fault of their own.
0 x

User avatar
Derwood
Stall Monitor
Posts: 78029
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 4:44 pm
Location: 375 Miles East of Wrigley
x 1968
x 4901

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby Derwood » Thu Nov 17, 2022 8:47 pm

UMFan83 wrote:Another ASG not at Wrigley:



Cubs have hosted 1 ASG in the last 62 years. 2026 is spoken for already, so if the Cubs don't get awarded the 2025 game, it will be 2027 at the earliest.



That Texas ballpark is ugly as sin. When they hosted the COVID-World-Series I marveled at how awful it looked on TV
1 x

User avatar
UMFan83
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 87815
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 8:42 pm
Location: Southport Ave
x 4962
x 8193
Contact:

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby UMFan83 » Fri Dec 02, 2022 12:46 am

Anyone else going to the London games next year? I just bought tickets to the Saturday game, looking forward to the experience.
0 x
Win it for Fred

17 Seconds
Hall of Fame
Posts: 25670
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:36 am
x 1090
x 3405

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby 17 Seconds » Sat Dec 03, 2022 11:53 pm

0 x

User avatar
Old Style
Superstar
Posts: 11502
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 4:57 pm
Location: Bedford, TX
x 9323
x 1292

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby Old Style » Thu Dec 08, 2022 3:25 pm

So who is left from the WS team? Hendricks? Anyone else?
0 x
"I'm sorry, folks outside of SEC country, but a few facts are incontrovertible. They smoke better barbecue than you. Their women are prettier than your women. They play football better than your schools play football." - Andy Staples, SI

User avatar
WrigleyField 22
Superstar
Posts: 18931
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 10:48 pm
Location: This is the Bad Place
x 7594
x 3475
Contact:

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby WrigleyField 22 » Thu Dec 08, 2022 4:33 pm

Old Style wrote:So who is left from the WS team? Hendricks? Anyone else?

David Ross (kind of counts :dontknow: )
0 x
Image

User avatar
PackLandVA
All-Star
Posts: 3348
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 5:42 pm
Location: Baking in Southern Arizona
x 1037
x 689

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby PackLandVA » Thu Dec 08, 2022 4:49 pm

WrigleyField 22 wrote:
Old Style wrote:So who is left from the WS team? Hendricks? Anyone else?

David Ross (kind of counts :dontknow: )


That's one more (or two) than is left from the 1908 team.
1 x
Sticks the landing!!!

CubinNY
Hall of Fame
Posts: 27709
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 5:52 pm
Location: Pike Road, Al
x 1109
x 2355

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby CubinNY » Mon Dec 12, 2022 1:43 pm

Given the PR spin by the Ricketts (Crane Kenny, PTR publicist/VP of Business), if Jed does not manage to upgrade the team and sits on the money that is supposed there is he, "on the hot seat" if the Cubs are again a 77 win team?
0 x

User avatar
TomtheBombadil
Superstar
Posts: 12448
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 8:35 pm
x 1363
x 1267

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby TomtheBombadil » Mon Dec 12, 2022 2:07 pm

CubinNY wrote:Given the PR spin by the Ricketts (Crane Kenny, PTR publicist/VP of Business), if Jed does not manage to upgrade the team and sits on the money that is supposed there is he, "on the hot seat" if the Cubs are again a 77 win team?


Seems like it? It does seem the owners are expecting money to be spent, probably aren’t to picky on who or what (outside of maybe a big name or two to market) since that’s Hoyer’s job. They might not even be a 77 win team if he doesn’t do some stuff
0 x
Spoiler: show
Image


"We struck down evil with the mighty sword of teamwork and the hammer of not-bickering." - The Shoveler

User avatar
Cubswin11
Hall of Fame
Posts: 29457
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 8:17 pm
x 10706
x 6836

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby Cubswin11 » Mon Dec 12, 2022 7:26 pm

Jed should come out and ask why Ricketts and Crane decided to take the legacy/long term play in the Marquee deal that required money put in and little money up front vs doing a comcast/Ballys/etc deal where they just got paid when we had our core so we had a bag to supplement them.
1 x
Screw Pitchers

User avatar
UMFan83
Inner-Circle HOF
Posts: 87815
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 8:42 pm
Location: Southport Ave
x 4962
x 8193
Contact:

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby UMFan83 » Mon Dec 12, 2022 9:28 pm

TomtheBombadil wrote:
CubinNY wrote:Given the PR spin by the Ricketts (Crane Kenny, PTR publicist/VP of Business), if Jed does not manage to upgrade the team and sits on the money that is supposed there is he, "on the hot seat" if the Cubs are again a 77 win team?


Seems like it? It does seem the owners are expecting money to be spent, probably aren’t to picky on who or what (outside of maybe a big name or two to market) since that’s Hoyer’s job. They might not even be a 77 win team if he doesn’t do some stuff


Yep, the reports that came out last week plus the Crane interview leave it pretty obvious. This is a franchise that has been cautious and calculated about setting expectations about individual offseasons and using vague statements like 'the money will be there when needed' to describe their future payrolls. The narrative has changed completely now based on the things they've said. They had to know that they were dramatically raising fan expectations. And now instead of 90% ownership blame, 10% FO blame (on twitter at least), its reversed.
0 x
Win it for Fred

17 Seconds
Hall of Fame
Posts: 25670
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:36 am
x 1090
x 3405

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby 17 Seconds » Mon Dec 12, 2022 9:56 pm

UMFan83 wrote:
TomtheBombadil wrote:
CubinNY wrote:Given the PR spin by the Ricketts (Crane Kenny, PTR publicist/VP of Business), if Jed does not manage to upgrade the team and sits on the money that is supposed there is he, "on the hot seat" if the Cubs are again a 77 win team?


Seems like it? It does seem the owners are expecting money to be spent, probably aren’t to picky on who or what (outside of maybe a big name or two to market) since that’s Hoyer’s job. They might not even be a 77 win team if he doesn’t do some stuff


Yep, the reports that came out last week plus the Crane interview leave it pretty obvious. This is a franchise that has been cautious and calculated about setting expectations about individual offseasons and using vague statements like 'the money will be there when needed' to describe their future payrolls. The narrative has changed completely now based on the things they've said. They had to know that they were dramatically raising fan expectations. And now instead of 90% ownership blame, 10% FO blame (on twitter at least), its reversed.


seems like they know jed is a wuss and thought it would be easy to call his bluff and shift the blame
0 x

User avatar
Sammy Sofa
Licks Butts
Posts: 90456
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:45 am
Location: Washington DC
x 22127
x 23248

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby Sammy Sofa » Mon Dec 12, 2022 10:10 pm

17 Seconds wrote:
UMFan83 wrote:
TomtheBombadil wrote:
Seems like it? It does seem the owners are expecting money to be spent, probably aren’t to picky on who or what (outside of maybe a big name or two to market) since that’s Hoyer’s job. They might not even be a 77 win team if he doesn’t do some stuff


Yep, the reports that came out last week plus the Crane interview leave it pretty obvious. This is a franchise that has been cautious and calculated about setting expectations about individual offseasons and using vague statements like 'the money will be there when needed' to describe their future payrolls. The narrative has changed completely now based on the things they've said. They had to know that they were dramatically raising fan expectations. And now instead of 90% ownership blame, 10% FO blame (on twitter at least), its reversed.


seems like they know jed is a wuss and thought it would be easy to call his bluff and shift the blame


Seems like a bunch of dumb horsefeathers all ping-ponging off of each other.
1 x
► Show Spoiler

17 Seconds
Hall of Fame
Posts: 25670
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:36 am
x 1090
x 3405

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby 17 Seconds » Mon Dec 12, 2022 10:12 pm

Sammy Sofa wrote:
17 Seconds wrote:
UMFan83 wrote:
Yep, the reports that came out last week plus the Crane interview leave it pretty obvious. This is a franchise that has been cautious and calculated about setting expectations about individual offseasons and using vague statements like 'the money will be there when needed' to describe their future payrolls. The narrative has changed completely now based on the things they've said. They had to know that they were dramatically raising fan expectations. And now instead of 90% ownership blame, 10% FO blame (on twitter at least), its reversed.


seems like they know jed is a wuss and thought it would be easy to call his bluff and shift the blame


Seems like a bunch of dumb horsefeathers all ping-ponging off of each other.


we'll never get it, but i'd love to hear theo's candid thoughts on all this
0 x

User avatar
Sammy Sofa
Licks Butts
Posts: 90456
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:45 am
Location: Washington DC
x 22127
x 23248

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby Sammy Sofa » Mon Dec 12, 2022 10:16 pm

17 Seconds wrote:
Sammy Sofa wrote:
17 Seconds wrote:
seems like they know jed is a wuss and thought it would be easy to call his bluff and shift the blame


Seems like a bunch of dumb horsefeathers all ping-ponging off of each other.


we'll never get it, but i'd love to hear theo's candid thoughts on all this


Just get him drunk. You know he's the type.
1 x
► Show Spoiler

champaignchris
All-Star
Posts: 1361
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 4:40 pm
x 15
x 333

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby champaignchris » Tue Dec 13, 2022 3:31 am

17 Seconds wrote:
Sammy Sofa wrote:
17 Seconds wrote:
seems like they know jed is a wuss and thought it would be easy to call his bluff and shift the blame


Seems like a bunch of dumb horsefeathers all ping-ponging off of each other.


we'll never get it, but i'd love to hear theo's candid thoughts on all this


Didn’t he walk away from several million dollars on the last year of his contract? That in itself spoke pretty loudly.
1 x

User avatar
CyHawk_Cub
Superstar
Posts: 12082
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 9:24 pm
x 775
x 6449

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby CyHawk_Cub » Tue Dec 13, 2022 3:42 am

It was $10 million, I think.
0 x

Bertz
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 6155
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2017 2:59 pm
x 2083
x 3316

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby Bertz » Tue Dec 20, 2022 4:53 pm



These are generally kinder to the Cubs than the Steamer projections already live on Fangraphs. On the position player side, it's a lot higher on Swanson and Wisdom, but lower on most of the young guys (including Morel and Mervis unfortunately), and most of the marginal/depth guys. The latter I expected as anecdotally Steamer seems to think essentially everyone in organized baseball would throw up at least 1 WAR in full playing time.

On the pitching side, ZiPS is much higher on the top of the rotation. Stroman and Steele get fairly soft inning projections, but their rate numbers are super strong. The depth guys, including Wicks and Brown, generally all look fairly decent as well. They all project to between 1-1.5 WAR if given 120 IP. Smyly is an exception, he gets a VERY horsefeathers projection.

The reliever group is relatively strong. Alzolay, Thompson, and Leiter all are projected as swingmen who put up 1+ WAR in 80-100 IP. Dan also notes in the writeup that Leiter projects to a 3.07 ERA if he codes him as a pure short reliever, have to imagine Adbert and Keegan would get similar bumps. Wick, Heuer, Hughes, Leeper, and Boxberger all project as solid but unspectacular 7th inning types. Jeremiah Estrada gets a very strong projection, easily the best of the pure 1 inning guys.

Overall promising stuff. I think from looking at this you'd probably want to add two more bats to the 1B/DH mix rather than just one, and stretch to add a late inning reliever even if the price is somewhat prohibitive. But this is a team that's likely to project right in the middle of that 5th/6th seed scrum after the rest of the expected offseason moves are made.
0 x

User avatar
TomtheBombadil
Superstar
Posts: 12448
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 8:35 pm
x 1363
x 1267

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby TomtheBombadil » Tue Dec 20, 2022 8:08 pm

Gallardo, Wicks, and Kilian got positive projections from ZiPs…Gallardo actually projected to throw the most IP…Keeeep going
0 x
Spoiler: show
Image


"We struck down evil with the mighty sword of teamwork and the hammer of not-bickering." - The Shoveler

Bull
Formerly MrWood
Posts: 4092
Joined: Fri May 02, 2003 3:54 pm
Location: Not St Louis anymore!
x 288
x 533

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby Bull » Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:32 am

Was it news that Henricks may not be ready for opening day? I don’t remember hearing that explicitly stated before.
0 x

PriorFighter
bench player
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 9:30 pm
x 7

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby PriorFighter » Mon Jan 16, 2023 8:16 pm

With Tim Stebbins being laid off, Cubs Talk Podcast is not going to be as good. Say what you will, but I liked the banter on that show. Curious what you guys think the best Cubs podcasts are or who has the best coverage outside some of the known names like Bleacher Report, BCB, Cubs Insider, etc.?
0 x

Bertz
5-Time All-Star
Posts: 6155
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2017 2:59 pm
x 2083
x 3316

Re: General Cubs Chit-Chat

Postby Bertz » Mon Jan 16, 2023 10:23 pm

Bull wrote:Was it news that Henricks may not be ready for opening day? I don’t remember hearing that explicitly stated before.


I think this weekend was the first time they said it outright, but they'd really been pumping the brakes on expectations for him all offseason so I think they've expected for a while.
0 x


Return to “Chicago Cubs Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bertz, Bing [Bot] and 4 guests